Allowed

Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Baua Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Aug 2017CR. MISC./40045/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who had no criminal antecedents and had been in custody for two and a half months, in a case involving recovery of foreign liquor under narcotic and prohibition laws. Bail was secured with bonds and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Baua Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40045 of 2017 (2) dt.23-08-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40045 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -71 Year- 2017 Thana -BANKA District- BANKA

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Baua Singh S/o Binay Kumar Singh Resident of village- Bijay Nagar, Ward No.-21, P.S.- Banka, District- Banka

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Renu Kumari APP

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 23-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 71 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a), 35(c) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

Allegation is of recovery of 135 litres of foreign liquor from the petitioner.

¶13

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 28.06.2017.

¶14

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶15

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40045 of 2017 (2) dt.23-08-2017

¶17

circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody for two and half months, as such, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Banka, in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 71 of 2017.

¶18

It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶19

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶20

sunil/-

¶21

U T

Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Baua Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritesh Kumar Singh @ Baua Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Krishna Patel @ Bhutta Patel Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Triloki Nath Ojha Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance

Vinay Shankar Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar

Kusheswar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar