Allowed

Ranjana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through C B I , Patna

Patna HC7 Sept 2017CR. MISC./39977/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a petition for anticipatory bail. The court granted release on bail upon arrest or surrender for offences under the IPC and PC Act, subject to standard conditions including surety and presence in court.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon arrest or surrender by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each subject to conditions under S. 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Ranjana Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar Through C B I , Patna — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39977 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2015 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- PATNA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjana Kumari wife of Shambhu Sharan Singh, resident of VillageKurkihar, P.S. Wazirganj, District- Gaya.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar, through C.B.I., Patna. null null

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SC, CBI. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶11

3 07-09-2017

¶12

The petitioner apprehends arrest in RC No. 1A/2015 instituted for the offence under Sections-120-B, 420, 467, 468 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections-13(1)(d) of P.C. Act.

¶13

It has been submitted that post of GDS-BPM is a part time employment. As per service condition, a Gramin Dak Sewak shall not be required to perform duty beyond a maximum period of five hours in a day. A GDS-BPM shall not be retained in employment beyond 65 years of age. It is further stipulated that a Sevak shall not claim to be at par with the servant of the Government. The official of Indian Postal Department who has issued the letter of appointment was not proceeded departmentally.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a lady. The other accused in similar nature of case in another case has

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39977 of 2017 (3) dt.07-09-2017

¶16

2/2

¶17

been granted anticipatory bail by coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 19-08-2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33525 of 2017.

¶18

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in RC No. 1A/2015 to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, CBI-II, Patna subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶19

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶20

A.K.V./U T

Ranjana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through C B I , Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through C B I , Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarwar Imam @ S. M. Sarwar Imam @ Sarwar Iam @ Dr. Sarwar Imam Vs The State Of Bihar Through The State Cabinet Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Distict, Patna

Raj Kishore Sahu Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Vigilance Investigation Bureau

Ghanshyam Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The Union Of India Through Central Bureau Of Investigation, Govt Of India , C B I / a C B , Patna

Md. Vasim Khan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Sah @ Mukesh Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.