Allowed

Upendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Sept 2017CR. MISC./39390/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Priya allowed an anticipatory bail petition filed by Upendra Mandal apprehending arrest in a murder case. The petitioner is to surrender within six weeks and furnish a bail bond with sureties subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed. Petitioner directed to surrender within six weeks, furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, and comply with specified conditions.

Upendra Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39390 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2017 Thana -TIKAPATTI District- PURNIA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Upendra Mandal, S/o Late Mahanth Mandal, R/o Village - Baidira Tola, Tikkapati, P.S. Tikapati, Dist Purnea.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Reena Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶6

5 12-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Tikkapatti P.S. Case No. 84 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 322 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

The informant has alleged in the written report that he got information that due to land dispute when his wife had gone to visit his land, she was assaulted and administered poison by this petitioner.

¶8

Case diary has been received.

¶9

The learned A.P.P. has submitted that none of the witnesses have claimed to see the occurrence. They all are hearsay witnesses. In the post-mortem report, the Doctor has preserved various viscera for forensic analysis to confirm the cause of death.

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39390 of 2017 (5) dt.12-09-2017

¶11

2/2

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Tikkapatti Case No. 84 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri D. Prakash, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶13

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶14

S.Ali/-

¶15

U T

Upendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vishwanath Mehta Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mohammad Mazhar Raza @ Mazhar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kritika Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Government Of Biha

Binod Giri Vs The State Of Bihar

Most Chandra Kala Devi Vs The State Of Bihar