Allowed

Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2017CR. MISC./38968/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving sections of the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act, subject to conditions including personal surrender within four weeks and furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions and surrender within four weeks.

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38968 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -161 Year- 2017 Thana -SAKRA District- MUZAFFARPUR

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jitendra Kumar Son of Late Devendra Mahto, Resident of VillageSarmastpur Mukti, Police-Station Sakra, Distt. Muzaffarpur

¶5

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(I-B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶7

2 21-08-2017

¶8

Allegation in brief is that both the accused persons

¶9

intercepted the informant on the way and Dharmendra put a pistol on his head and this petitioner, brother of Dharmendra intended to assault him with knife but seeing others coming there they escaped away then Dharmendra was apprehended by the local people.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and informant are cousin. There is some family dispute, so this petitioner has falsely been implicated and he was not apprehended at the spot rather Dharmendra was apprehended and

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38968 of 2017 (2) dt.21-08-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

pistol was not recovered from possession of the petitioner and petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

¶14

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the concerned court, let the petitioner, namely, Jitendra Kumar be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-cum-Sub Judge, 13th, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No.161 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶15

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶16

N.H./-

¶17

U T

Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nasim Alam and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Babulal Mahto @ Babulal Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vijay Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandradev Das and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Gautam Baitha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.