Dismissed

Ramashish Bin v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Dec 2017CR. MISC./38255/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought bail in a dowry death murder case where previous bail application was rejected. High Court dismissed the bail plea considering the strong onus on the husband and directed the trial court to conclude the case within nine months.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; trial court directed to conclude trial within 9 months; administration enjoined to ensure witness production.

Ramashish Bin Vs The State Of Bihar — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38255 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2015 Thana -NADI NAINAHA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)

¶3

====================================================== Ramashish Bin Son of Nath Bin, R/o Village- Chakadahaua, P.S.- Nadi, District- West Champaran.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prithvi Nath Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 06-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶6

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

It is alleged that the petitioner committed murder of the deceased due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

¶8

Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure-1 to the present application, taking into account that the petitioner was the husband of the deceased. The onus was on him to explain the cause of the death of the deceased.

¶9

A report was called for from the trial Court regarding the stage of the case. It has been reported that charge has already been framed in this case and within a period of 9 months, the trial

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38255 of 2017 (3) dt.06-12-2017

¶11

2/2

¶12

is likely to be concluded.

¶13

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected in connection with Nadi P.S. Case No. 07/2015, pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Bagaha, West Champaran.

¶14

The Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/ production of copy of this order.

¶15

The District Magistrate, Bagaha and the Superintendent of Police, Bagaha are directed to ensure that the prosecution witnesses are produced in the court on the date fixed by the court below, so that the trial could be concluded within the stipulated period.

¶16

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the District Magistrate, Bagaha and the Superintendent of Police, Bagaha.

¶17

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶18

Amit/-

¶19

U T

Ramashish Bin v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramashish Bin v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhash Kumar Suman Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandra Kant Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kanti Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dhananjay Kumar @ Laukesh Vs The State Of Bihar

Kapila Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Hare Ram Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar