This is a one-line oral order dismissing an anticipatory bail petition as infructuous because the petitioner had already been arrested during its pendency.
Dismissal of the anticipatory bail petition as it has become infructuous due to the arrest of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37611 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2017 Thana- BHAGWANGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
Sudheshwar Manjhi , Son of Late Munarik Manjhi, resident of Rouniachak Mushahri Tola, P.S.- Bhagwanganj, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Sri Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 22-11-2017 Sri Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner in presence of learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that during pendency of this petition, petitioner has already been arrested and as such, this anticipatory bail petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, it stands dismissed as same has become infructuous.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
praful/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail petition remains maintainable when the petitioner has already been arrested during the pendency of the petition.
Sudheshwar Manjhi
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
