6 . Per contra, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No.2 has submitted that bare perusal of the complaint petition as well as the materials on record, including the charge sheet would show the complicity of the petitioner herein in the alleged occurrence and this is not a case which should be taken lightly inasmuch as malpractice and misbehaviour on behalf of the employees/ staff/ personnel of the Railway department is increasing day by day and harassment of the passengers at their hands has been increasing as well as has remained unchecked, resulting in unsafe travelling by train. It has been further submitted by the learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party No.2 that the accused persons being railway employees ought to have been more responsible as well as they owe a duty towards the passengers, hence any indecent behaviour on their part cannot be tolerated and is liable to be dealt with iron hands so that in future such incidents do not reoccur. It has also been submitted that the case of the aforesaid Akhilesh Kumar, wherein this Court by an order dated 24.07.2014 has been pleased to quash the order taking cognizance, as against him, is distinguishable from the present case inasmuch as admittedly, as also as per the complaint petition, the said accused person, namely, Akhilesh Kumar, was instrumental in removing the aforesaid accused persons, who were engaging in indecent behaviour from the alleged
