Murlidhar Manmohan @ Murlidhar Manmohan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Aug 2017CR. MISC./36512/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail arising from a 2010 criminal case involving allegations of unnatural offence. Rejecting the plea based on the delay and prior settlement, the Court refused anticipatory bail but directed surrender for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

anticipatory bail refused; directive to surrender within six weeks for regular bail.

Murlidhar Manmohan @ Murlidhar Manmohan Singh Vs The State Of… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36512 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2010 Thana -TISIAUTA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Murlidhar Manmohan @ Murlidhar Manmohan Singh S/o late Ram Ekbal Singh R/o Village- Jasparha, P.S.- Tisiauta, District- Vaishali.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rina Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh(App)

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 10-08-2017 Heard the parties.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 43 of 2010 registered for offences punishable under Sections 323. 377, 511, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Allegation against the petitioner is of attempt to commit unnatural offence and also some other offence. It appears that the case is of the year 2010 and the petitioner has now come up before this Court for grant of anticipatory bail after 7 years of the alleged occurrence.

¶13

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that both the parties have settled the dispute and he has been

¶14

falsely implicated in this case.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36512 of 2017 (2) dt.10-08-2017

¶16

2/2

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, petitioner may surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks and make prayer for regular bail, which will be disposed of by the Court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

¶19

With the aforesaid observation, the application stands

¶20

disposed of.

¶21

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶22

Manish/-

¶23

U T

Murlidhar Manmohan @ Murlidhar Manmohan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murlidhar Manmohan @ Murlidhar Manmohan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pintu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Gorelal Rawani @ Jagjeewan Jee @ Gorelal Jee Vs The State Of Bihar

Shivji Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Ibrar Miyan Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajiv Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.