The High Court of Patna disposed of a Miscellaneous application seeking quashing of a summons order. It directed the Judicial Magistrate to frame orders on a compromise petition filed within four weeks.
Direction to pass necessary orders on the compromise petition filed in the Magistrate's Court within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36121 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -857 Year- 2012 Thana -GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGOPALGANJ
=========================================================== Ravish Kumar S/O Late Heera Lal Sah Resident of Proprietor Rajshree Jewellers, New City Post Office Chouk, Main Road, P.O And P.S- Motihari, DistrictMotihari.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties.
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP For opposite party no. 2 : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-04-2017
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the offences under which cognizance has been taken are compoundable with permission of the Court and recently, a compromise petition has been filed before the learned ACJM-III, Goapalganj.
In view of the submissions made above, the application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36121 of 2013 dt.24-04-2017
2/2
Procedure for quashing the order dated 11.10.2012 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gopalganj in Tr. No. 2644 of 2013 arising out of Complaint Case No. 857 of 2012 whereby the petitioner has been summoned to face trial, is disposed of with a direction to the learned Magistrate to pass necessary orders on the compromise petition filed in his Court on 03.01.2017 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAVDATE | NA |
| UploadingDate | 25.04.2017 |
| Transmission Date |
25.04.2017 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the complaint under Section 482 CrPC regarding compoundable offences be quashed in light of a filed compromise petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravish Kumar
The State of Bihar
Om Prakash Sah
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
