Allowed

Md. Abdullah @ Md. Abdul @ Md. Muslim and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jul 2017CR. MISC./32061/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of Patna High Court allowed bail to petitioners in a robbery case (Sections 395, 397 IPC) where names were disclosed by a co-accused already on bail. Directed release on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two close relative sureties of the like amount each.

Md. Abdullah @ Md. Abdul @ Md. Muslim and Anr. Vs The State Of… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32061 of 2017 (3) dt.27-07-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32061 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -425 Year- 2015 Thana -AHIAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR

¶4

====================================================== 1. Md. Abdullah @ Md. Abdul @ Md. Muslim S/o Late Bajir Ansari @ Dukha Miyan

¶5

Md. Mazoor Alam @ Manzoor Alam S/o - Md. Sanif Both residents of village - Mithansarai, P.S. - Ahiyapur, Dist. - Muzaffarpur.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Khurshid Anwar

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 27-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

¶14

The petitioners seek bail in Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 425 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Sections-395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

It is alleged in the written report that in the night of 20/21-5-2015, 20-25 unknown persons armed with gun, Danda etc. entered into house and looted the property ornaments worth Rs. 1,76,000.00 and also looted cash of the son of the informant amounting to more than lacs. The culprits were of age group 20-30 years and two of them about 50-60 years.

¶16

It has been submitted that the petitioners are not named in the first informant report. No TIP has been conducted. The

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32061 of 2017 (3) dt.27-07-2017

¶18

name of the petitioners has been disclosed by co-accused Md. Irshad in his confessional statement, who has already been granted bail by coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 20-08-2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 34258 of 2015.

¶19

In such circumstances, prayer for bail is allowed. The petitioners named above are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 425 of 2015 to the satisfaction of Ms. Rani Kumari, learned Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur subject to condition that both the bailors should be close relative of the petitioners.

¶20

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶21

A.K.V./-

¶22

U T

Md. Abdullah @ Md. Abdul @ Md. Muslim and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Abdullah @ Md. Abdul @ Md. Muslim and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Sahni and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shiv Kumar @ Bittu and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shashi Ranjan @ Niranjan Vs The State Of Bihar

Saurabh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jamil Akhtar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kewat Vs The State Of Bihar