Single judge allowed bail to Binod Nut in a theft case (Section 395 IPC). Court noted absence of recovery and lack of T.I. parade, and prior bail of a co-accused whose name appeared in petitioner's confession.
Released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31248 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -243 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHPUR District- BHOJPUR
====================================================== 1. Binod Nut Son of Late Baleshwat Nut, Karnamepur, P.S. Sahpur, Dist. Bhojpur
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudha Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kanhaiya Kishore
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER
2 10-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. He has not been put on T.I. parade. The name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused, Baban Yadav, who has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.05.2017 in Cr. Misc. No. 19314 of 2017.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.
Let, above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31248 of 2017 (2) dt.10-07-2017
2/2
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., XIV,Bhojpur,Arrah in connection with Sahpur P.S.Case No. 243 of 2016, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be close relatives of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
singh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case under Section 395 IPC where no recovery was made and the petitioner did not undergo T.I. parade.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Binod Nut
The State of Bihar
Sanjaya Priya Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
