Petitioner sought quashment of impugned order taking cognizance under Section 294A IPC. Court dismissed application noting charges were already framed and directed expedited trial.
Application for quashing order is dismissed owing to framing of charges; expeditious trial directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No 30879 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -304 Year- 2012 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA
=========================================================== Vikram Chauhan S/o Sri Jitan Chauhan R/o Chauhan Tola, P.S.- Sadar, DistrictPurnea
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 03-08-2017
This application has been filed for quashing the order dated 07.11.2012 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea taking cognizance of the offence under Section 294A of Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of Bihar State Lottery Act.
2 Counsel for the petitioner has appeared and submitted that in the instant case, charges have already been framed by the Court below.
3 In view of the aforesaid development subsequent to filing of the instant petition, the instant quashing application is dismissed.
4 Needless to say, the Court below shall expedite the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30879 of 2014 dt.03-08-2017
2/2
trial without any unnecessary delay.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAVDATE | NA |
| UploadingDate | 04.08.2017 |
| Transmission Date |
04.08.2017 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for quashing the order taking cognizance of the offence should be allowed when charges have already been framed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vikram Chauhan
The State of Bihar
Upendra Narain Yadav
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
