Allowed

Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2017CR. MISC./30846/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged forgery and cheating. The petitioner, who was a witness to a disputed sale deed and faced no specific forgery allegation, was allowed bail on surrender within four weeks upon furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, to be surrendered within four weeks.

Satyendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30846 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30846 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2017 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD

¶4

====================================================== Satyendra Yadav, S/o Ramdeni Yadav, R/o Village-Anugrah Nagar P.S. Town Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 06-07-2017 Heard both sides.

¶7

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 113 of 2017 registered for the offence under Section 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the I.P.C.

¶8

As per written report, the allegation is that this petitioner and other co-accused named in the FIR committed fraud and brought into existence a registered sale deed in the name of one of the FIR co-accused Gopal Singh. The accused persons impersonating the informant got the sale deed executed by setting a different lady. The allegation of impersonation is omnibus. The informant has lodged the case against the full brother of her husband. There appears bona fide land dispute between the parties as a Title Suit no. 12 of 2010 filed by the mother-in-law of the

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30846 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017

¶10

informant against her husband and another Title Suit no. 41 of 2017 with respect to land in dispute are pending between the parties as asserted by the petitioner at paragraph 11 of the application. This petitioner allegedly witnessed the sale deed in question and no specific act of committing forgery has been alleged against him.

¶11

In the facts and circumstances of the case the prayer of bail application is allowed. The petitioner above named, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad Town P.S. Case No. 113 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2), the code of Criminal Procedure.

¶12

(Sanjay Kumar, J)

¶13

rohit/-

¶14

U T

Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rameshwar Pandey and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Abha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Prakash Kumar and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sakaldeep Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhaneshsari Devi @ Dhaneshari Devi @ Dhaneshwari Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar