In a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a PS case, the High Court of Patna dismissed the instant petition as not pressed, noting that the parties had amicably resolved their issues via a joint compromise petition filed in the lower court, thus ending unnecessary litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30717 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA
===========================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
===========================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 30-08-2017
Counsel for the petitioners, counsel for the State and
the counsel for the Opposite Party no. 2, are present.
It is submitted that there are various cases between the
parties and that now the parties have amicably resolved the issue. It is also submitted that a joint compromise petition has been filed in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30717 of 2014 dt.31-08-2017
2/2
the court below and the steps are being taken pursuant thereto for bringing to end all the unwanted litigations between the parties.
In view of the aforesaid developments, the instant
petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Prakash/-
| AFR/NAFR | |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | |
| UploadingDate | 04.09.2017 |
| Transmission Date |
04.09.2017 |
Asha Devi and others
State of Bihar and Nand Kishore Prasad Singh
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
