Dismissed

Kamini Singh @ Kamini Devi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jul 2017CR. MISC./30330/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge oral order in Criminal Misc. application seeking anticipatory bail. The High Court rejected the petitioners' prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with a police case alleging cheating and forgery, considering the nature of allegations and their involvement. The petitioners were granted leave to intend bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners in PS Case No.145 of 2017 is rejected.

Kamini Singh @ Kamini Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30330 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -145 Year- 2017 Thana -BIRAUL District- DARBHANGA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Kamini Singh @ Kamini Devi, wife of Ashok Kumar

¶4

Roushan Kumar, son of Ashok Kumar, both resident of villageAlampur Kodaria, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur.

¶5

Sushil Singh @ Sushil Kumar, son of Birendra Prasad, resident of village- Bihuliya Raipur, P.S.- Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur.

¶6

.... .... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 07-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶14

State.

¶15

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with a case registered under Sections 467, 468, 471, 419, 420, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Allegation in brief is that the petitioners are running a non-banking organization and are engaged in doing Health Insurance as well as sanctioning loan on curative terms and thus cheating public in general. Police recovered several incriminating documents.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not owner of the Company. Allegation shows that the Company is being run by the petitioners.

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30330 of 2017 (2) dt.07-07-2017

¶19

2/2

¶20

Having considered the nature of the allegation and involvement of the petitioners, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, namely, Kamini Singh @ Kamini Devi, Roushan Kumar and Sushil Singh @ Sushil Kumar is rejected in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No.145 of 2017 pending in the court of A.C.J.M., Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga.

¶21

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶22

N.H./-

¶23

U T

Kamini Singh @ Kamini Devi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamini Singh @ Kamini Devi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deep Prakash @ Golu Vs The State Of Bihar

Reena Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Wakil Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Manas Kumar Mishra Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Harvinder Pal Singh Chadha Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudhist Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar