Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous petition, with liberty to institute suit if prejudice arises. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to file subsequent legal proceedings if prejudice is found; petition dismissed due to withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30028 of 2015 (7) dt.17-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30028 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -245 Year- 2006 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uma Kant Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari (APP)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the instant petition for the present keeping his interest immune in case, is found prejudiced subsequently. Giving such liberty, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra Kumar
The State of Bihar
Upendra Kumar Rai
Smt. Manorama Mishra
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
