Allowed

Govinda Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2017CR. MISC./29040/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to Govinda Kumar in a dacoity and illegal arms possession case, noting his tender age, status as a mere implicator, lack of recovery from him, and prior anticipatory bail in another matter.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release the petitioner on regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Govinda Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29040 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2017 Thana -SIWAN CITY District- SIWAN

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Govinda Kumar Son of Chhathu Lal @ Chhathu Lal Chauhan, Resident of Mohalla- Dakhin Tola, P.S.- Siwan Town, District- Siwan.

¶5

The State of Bihar

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶7

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandrasen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶9

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Siwan Town PS case no. 59 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402/34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b), 26, 35 of Arms Act.

¶10

The allegation leveled by the informant is that a secret information was received that some people were conspiring to conduct dacoity. Thereupon, the police team had reached near Hanuman temple where 5-6 persons were present however, upon seeing police party, they started fleeing away but two persons are said to have been apprehended who had told the name of the petitioner as one of the person who had fled away from place of occurrence upon seeing police party.

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29040 of 2017 (2) dt.01-07-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that that the petitioner is of tender age, he has been merely implicated upon the instance of other main accused persons, no recovery has been made from his possession and he is in custody since 22.04.2017. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that though he is an accused in one another case but he has already been granted anticipatory bail in that case.

¶14

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct the petitioner to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siwan Town PS case no. 59 of 2017.

¶15

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J.)

¶16

rinkee/-

¶17

U T

Govinda Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govinda Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Udit Narayan Sah @ Undit Sah and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shyam Kishore Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Anjani Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shashi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Kapil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar