Allowed

Md. Saeem @ Md. Naseem @ Md. Sahim @ Naseem v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2017CR. MISC./28796/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral bail order. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon initiation of case regarding the presence of simple injuries on the petitioner on substance for his release on bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to CJM, Madhepura.

Md. Saeem @ Md. Naseem @ Md. Sahim @ Naseem Vs The State… — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No 28796 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2017 Thana -SRI NAGAR District- MADHEPURA

¶3

====================================================== MD SAEEM @ MD NASEEM @ MD SAHIM @ NASEEM Son of Md Saleem @ Thithar Resident of Village - Chainpur, P.S. Srinagar, District - Madhepura.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr Dinesh Prasad Verma, Advocate For the S t a t e : Smt Indu Bala Pandey, APP

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 447, 341, 323, 325, 504, 436, 379/34 of Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Submission is made on behalf of the petitioner that the allegations against the petitioner are general and omnibus alongwith 14 other persons. He submits that he is innocent and has committed no offence. The instant prosecution is outcome of land dispute between the parties and that all the sections are bailable except Sections 379 and 436 of IPC, allegations in respect of the said two sections have specifically been levelled against the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28796 of 2017 (2) dt.01-07-2017

¶16

2/2

¶17

other co-accused persons and not against the petitioner. Further submission is that there is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has also annexed the injury reports of the alleged injured persons of the instant FIR, namely, Abdul Razzak and Zainab Khatoon and submitted that from perusal of the same, it is apparent that the injuries sustained by them are simple in nature.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid submissions, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Srinagar Police Station Case No 35 of 2017.

¶19

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶20

M.E.H. /-

¶21

U T

Md. Saeem @ Md. Naseem @ Md. Sahim @ Naseem v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Saeem @ Md. Naseem @ Md. Sahim @ Naseem v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mosmat Juvaida Khatoon and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shivo Yadav Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Zahiruddin and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Naresh Puri Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Juber Vs The State Of Bihar

Sundram Chaudhary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar