Allowed

Hari Bhajan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jul 2017CR. MISC./27662/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner Hari Bhajan Sah accused under SCI 364 IPC in a kidnapping case. The high court directed release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 plus two sureties upon satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Hari Bhajan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27662 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -334 Year- 2016 Thana -MOHANIA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR)

¶3

====================================================== Hari Bhajan Sah, son of Nathuni Sah, resident of Village- Mujan, P.S.Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 12-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶7

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 334 of 2016, registered under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

The accusation is that on 02.07.2016 Buchi Yadav, son of the informant, was plying passenger vehicle, when he reached ahead one kilometer to Mohania, then some persons came on Bolero vehicle and forcibly took her son in the Bolero and moved towards Mohaniya. The passenger of the vehicle disclosed about kidnapping of her son Buchi Yadav. The informant raised suspicion about kidnapping of her son Buchi Yadav by this petitioner with the help of his brother-in-law and two others because, accused persons threatened the informant for dire consequences 10 days prior to the occurrence.

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27662 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017

¶10

2/2

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that informant disclosed the name of the petitioner and his other relative as accused having hand in the kidnapping of her son Buchi Yadav mere on suspicion due to grudge and enmity, while the victim was found on the date of occurrence in the evening in unconscious state inside the road at Buxar, but after five months of the occurrence his statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded on 18.12.2016 in which he supported the prosecution case about his kidnapping by the petitioner and his relative. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 11.04.2017.

¶12

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 334 of 2016.

¶13

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶14

manish/-

¶15

U T

Hari Bhajan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hari Bhajan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Ajay Kumar Sinha @ Ajay Kumar Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar

Laila Kumar @ Chandrashekhar Das @ Laula Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanoj Mistry Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Krishnadeo Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kailash Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar