Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's criminal miscellaneous application dismissed as infructuous on joint submission by all counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26147 of 2014
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1150 Year-2011 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE District- Rohtas
======================================================
Surendra Pratap Singh Son of Late Gama Singh Resident of Mohalla-Behind R.P.S.College, Raghunath Path, Satyam Shivam Colony, Danapur, Patna, presently residing at Roy Sadan, Saket Nagar, (Near National Public School), P.S.-Model Town, Sasaram, District-Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Binod Singh For the State : Mr. ANUJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA (APP) For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ranvijay Narain Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 09-08-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned counsel for the State are present and submit that the matter has become infructuous.
This application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(S. Kumar, J)
ranjan/-
U
Surendra Pratap Singh
The State of Bihar
Niraj Kumar Gupta
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court