Allowed

Sharda Bhagat and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Aug 2017CR. MISC./23081/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioners in a criminal case involving grievous hurt and other offences. The court noted the existence of a counter-case, lengthy custody, and simple injuries, subjecting release to conditions including local sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each.

Sharda Bhagat and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23081 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2017 Thana -KATEYA District- GOPALGANJ

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sharda Bhagat Son of Late Ramawtar Bhagat

¶5

Bikram Bhagat @ Vikram Bhagat Son of Sharda Bhagat Both are Resident of Village- Bshunpura, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.

¶6

.... .... Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 01-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶11

This is an application for bail in connection with Kateya P.S.Case No. 29 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 448, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Allegation against petitioner No.1 is of assaulting the brother of informant by spade and petitioner No.2 is of assaulting by bhala.

¶13

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is case and counter case between the parties and injuries are simple in nature and they are in custody for more than four months.

¶14

Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant also. They have opposed the prayer for bail stating that injury is on vital part on the brother of informant.

¶15

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and also considering the fact that injuries are simple in

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23081 of 2017 (4) dt.01-08-2017

¶17

2/2

¶18

nature, let the petitioners, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XV, Gopalganj, in connection with Kateya P.S.Case No. 29 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :-

¶19

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

¶20

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

¶21

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail.

¶22

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶23

spal/-

¶24

Sharda Bhagat and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharda Bhagat and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjit Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Mulin Das @ Molin Das and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jyoti Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Arbind Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Economics Offence Unit, Govt. Of Bihar , Patna

Bishun Yadav @ Vishun Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Upendra Narayan Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.