Partly allowed

Sanjay Sahni and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2017CR. MISC./21223/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting pre-arrest bail to petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 (female relatives) as no specific allegations exist against them, while rejecting the plea for Nos. 1 and 2 due to the gravity of the offence under Section 304-B IPC.

What did the court decide?

Release of Petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 on bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Sanjay Sahni and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21223 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -299 Year- 2016 Thana -SARAI RANJAN District- SAMASTIPUR

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Sanjay Sahni, S/o Rampulis Sahni,

¶6

Rampulis Sahni, S/o Jageshwar Sahni.

¶7

Sumitra Devi, W/o Sanjay Sahni.

¶8

Sushila Devi, W/o Rampulis Sahni,

¶9

All R/o Village- Harpur Barheta, P.S.- Sarairanjan, Distt.- Samastipur.

¶10

.... .... Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate

¶16

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, APP

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶20

counsel for the State.

¶21

The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 299 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 328 and 304-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶22

Regard being had to the gravity of the offence and the serious nature of allegation made in the FIR, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner nos.1 and 2,

¶23

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21223 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017

¶24

2 / 2

¶25

namely, Sanjay Sahni and Rampulis Sahni. Accordingly, their application for grant of pre-arrest bail is rejected.

¶26

So far as petitioner nos. 3 and 4, namely, Sumitra Devi and Sushila Devi are concerned, they, being sister-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased and there being no specific allegation against them, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Samastipur in connection with Sarairanjan P.S. Case No. 299 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today.

¶27

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)

¶28

Sanjeet/-

¶29

U T

Sanjay Sahni and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Sahni and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Shaku Rahman Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Basanti Kumari Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bijay Shankar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Amit Kumar Ambedkar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rajesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar