Allowed

Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 May 2017CR. MISC./17800/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Pappu Yadav, in a case for possession of foreign liquor under the Excise Amendment Act, 2016, subject to conditions including a bail bond and an undertaking against future violations.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000/- and two sureties of like amount, subject to undertaking against future violations.

Pappu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Patna HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

,N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17800 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -239 Year- 2016 Thana -MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE DistrictGAYA

¶3

====================================================== Pappu Yadav Son of Lekhraj Yadav @ Lakhraj Yadav Resident of Village - Chapardah, P.S. - M.M.C.H., District - Gaya.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶6

3 01-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶7

The petitioner seeks bail in M.M.C.H, P.S. Case No.239 of 2016 registered for the offence under Section 30 (a), 38 (I) of Excise Amendment Act, 2016.

¶8

It is alleged that 40 bottles each containing 375 ml. and 12 bottles each containing 750 ml. of foreign liquor, as mentioned in the written report, has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. Seizure list was, accordingly, prepared.

¶9

The petitioner is said to be in custody since 4.1.2017. As per paragraph 3 of the petition, petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17800 of 2017 (3) dt.01-05-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the C.J.M., Gaya, in M.M.C.H. P.S. Case No.239 of 2016, subject to the conditions that both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

¶14

The petitioner will give undertaking before the court below that he would not indulge in such activities in future, otherwise, his bail bond will be cancelled.

¶15

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶16

AnilKrSinha/-

¶17

Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babloo @ Shahwaz @ Babloo Shahwaz Vs The State Of Bihar

Sintu Bhar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Akhilesh Singh @ Akhileshwar Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Verma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Manoj Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramadhar Rai and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar