Allowed

Bablu Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Apr 2017CR. MISC./14641/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a criminal case involving criminal mischief and assault, considering a counter FIR lodged by them alleging arson by the prosecution side. The petitioners were released on furnishing bail bonds and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount, to be surrendered within 30 days.

Bablu Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14641 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2017 Thana -GOPALPUR District- PATNA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bablu Yadav

¶5

Bullu Yadav Both are sons of Late Rajendra Yadav Both are residents of Village - Udaini, P.S. - Gopalpur, District - Patna.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P.

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 06-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the

¶14

Arms Act.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioners is that they had fired from their firearms. However, no injury was caused to anyone.

¶16

Submission of the petitioners is that false allegation is there as a day before the present First Information Report, the petitioners’ side had lodged Gopalpur Police Station Case No. 20 of 2017 under Section 435 of the Indian Penal Code with

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14641 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017

¶18

2/2

¶19

allegation that the prosecution side had committed arson in the Khaliayn of the petitioners.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-IX-cumAdditional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna/successor Court in connection with Gopalpur Police Station Case No. 21 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

¶21

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶22

Kundan/-

¶23

U T

Bablu Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Rabindra Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Tej Narain Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Yogendra Roy Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukul Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Suresh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Narayan Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.