Dismissed

Brijmohan Ram @ Brij Mohan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jul 2017CR. MISC./13077/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court rejected the bail application of a former teacher accused of defalcating educational funds. It directed the trial court to expedite the trial and noted that the petitioner might be considered for regular bail if he pays the outstanding amount.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer rejected; trial court directed to expedite trial; regular bail considerable if outstanding amount is paid.

Brijmohan Ram @ Brij Mohan Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13077 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2016 Thana -PAUTHU District- AURANGABAD

¶3

====================================================== Brijmohan Ram @ Brij Mohan Ram, son of late Ramkrit Ram @ Ram Krit Ram, resident of Village- Araikhap, P.S.- Khudwan, District- Aurangabad.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No 13, Advocate. Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶5

6 19-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in Pauthu P.S. Case No. 34 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

It is alleged that this petitioner while working as a

¶7

teacher in Middle School, Alpa Haspura, withdrew Rs.12,76,388/- which was the amount allotted for construction of four additional class room, out of which, he executed work only for Rs.5,91,670/- and work for Rs. 8,27,007/- remained undone. Apart from this, in the same financial year, an amount of Rs.2,55,000/- was allotted for the construction of Headmaster Chamber, out of which, work was executed only for Rs.1,49,067/- and rest amount of Rs.1,59,993/- was lying with

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13077 of 2017 (6) dt.19-07-2017

¶9

2/2

¶10

the accused. In this manner, the accused petitioner has defalcated total amount of Rs.9,87,000/-

¶11

A report was called for from the present Principal/Incharge of the concerned school which has been received wherein it has been mentioned that the petitioner left the construction work in complete prior to his retirement, although, he has withdrawn the total amount of construction work.

¶12

Learned A.P.P. has appeared and opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶13

In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶14

Prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

¶15

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. In the event the petitioner offers in the court below to make payment of the entire amount of outstanding, the court below will consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

¶16

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶17

S.Ali/-

¶18

U T

Brijmohan Ram @ Brij Mohan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijmohan Ram @ Brij Mohan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Biltu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Gupta @ Sanjeev Ranjan Gupta and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Smt. Rita Singh and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Asha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Fadi Fadel Vs The State Of Bihar

Dil Khush @ Gulam Rabbani Vs The State Of Bihar