Disposed

Daya Shankar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC17 May 2017CR. MISC./11242/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court modified an order in a bail application by the petitioner, allowing a one-week extension to deposit 20% of the alleged misappropriated amount of Rs. 73,21,325.25 to secure release on bail.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of by modifying the order to allow petitioner to deposit 20% of the amount within one week and extending surrender period by three weeks, subject to submission of bank draft recei

Daya Shankar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11242 of 2016

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Daya Shankar Singh S/o Late Maharaj Narayan Singh, resident of Village- Bhundi Tekari, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua).

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Kaimur at Bhabua.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 17-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 22.5.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 22546 of 2015 to the extent that the petitioner may be permitted to deposit the undertaken 20% of the alleged due amount within a period of one week from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶12

The petitioner preferred Cr. Misc. No. 22546 of 2015 with a prayer for grant of anticipatory bail in a case registered under sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The prosecution case is that the petitioner being rice miller was supplied 6254.93 quintals of paddy in the financial

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11242 of 2016 (2) dt.17-05-2017

¶15

2/3

¶16

years 2012-13 and he was supposed to supply 4190.80 quintals of processed rice by 31.12.2014 but he could not supply 3380.80 quintals of processed rice worth Rs.73,21,325.25 and thereby misappropriated the said amount.

¶17

On submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to deposit 20% of the due amount of Rs.73,21,325.25 before the concerned authority, the petitioner was directed to be released on anticipatory bail. Since the petitioner could not manage the amount within the stipulated time but he is ready to deposit the same.

¶18

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the BSFC has no objection to the deposit of the amount by the petitioner.

¶19

In the circumstances, if the petitioner deposits 20% of the due amount before the District Manager, Kaimur at Bhabua and submits the receipt of bank draft before the learned court below within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order then the bail bonds of the petitioner will be accepted by the learned court below. The period of surrender of the petitioner is hereby extended by three weeks from today in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 152 of 2015 pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabua. Other conditions

¶20

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11242 of 2016 (2) dt.17-05-2017

¶21

3/3

¶22

stipulated in the order dated 22.5.2015 shall remain the same.

¶23

The order dated 22.5.2015 stands modified to the

¶24

extent indicated above.

¶25

Accordingly, the modification application is

¶26

disposed of.

¶27

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶28

Anil/-

¶29

U T

Daya Shankar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Daya Shankar Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Sahu Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Fulmati Devi @ Sanyukta Devi and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Uma Shankar Mishra and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Barhan Prasad @ Barhan Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Radhey Shyam Sharma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Prema Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.