An oral bail petition was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel due to ignorance regarding the petitioner's criminal antecedents. The court allowed the withdrawal.
Permission to withdraw the bail petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10928 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -191 Year- 2016 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR
======================================================
Bhim Pandey @ Ramesh Pandey, son of Shashi Mohan Pandey, Resident of Village- Mali Pokharbhinda, Police Station- Sheohar in the district of Sheohar.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar -1, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail petition as he was not informed correctly about the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. The petitioner has got criminal antecedent and besides three criminal cases mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition, the petitioner is accused in many other cases.
Prayer is allowed.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)
KKSINHA/-
U T
Bhim Pandey @ Ramesh Pandey
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
