The High Court permitted the appellants to withdraw their criminal appeal to facilitate obtaining regular bail. The lower court was directed to consider the merits of the case without being influenced by this order.
Appellants permitted to withdraw appeal to regularise bail proceedings; lower court to consider merits independently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.588 of 2017 (3) dt.11-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.588 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -267 Year- 2016 Thana -DHAKA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)
======================================================
1. Surendra Singh, son of Jangi Singh,
2. Reema Devi, wife of Ritesh Singh,
3. Banarshi Devi, wife of Surendra Singh,
4. Pankesh Singh @ Punkesh Singh, son of Surendra Singh,
5. Ritesh Singh, son of Surendra Singh,
All are resident of Village- Jamua, Police Station- Dhaka, District- East Champaran.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance:
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt Usha Kumari No-1
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
3. 11-04-2017 After some argument, learned counsel for the
appellants is permitted to withdraw the instant appeal in order to facilitate appellants to take regular bail and during course of appreciation of the same, the learned lower court will consider the merit of the case without being influenced by the instant order.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
Surendra Singh and others
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
