The appellant sought withdrawal of the criminal appeal memo. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the criminal appeal allowed; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.416 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -329 Year- 2016 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ====================================================== Shailendra Yadav & Ors .... .... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rahul Nath, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Kirshna, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 08-04-2017 Learned counsel for the appellants seeks withdrawal of instant memo of appeal and the same is allowed. Accordingly, instant memo of appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
Sudha/-
U T
Shailendra Yadav & Ors.
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
