coupled with the fact that during course of search, loaded fire arm along with cartridges were recovered from the possession of the appellant. That being so, the judgment of conviction and order of sentence is found legal, just and proper. As such the same be affirmed. 13. From the evidence available on the record, it is evident that PW-1, ASI, Khalid Akhtar as well as PW-4, informant, O/C of Khaira PS have categorically stated with regard to receiving of an information at the end of O/C Town PS regarding abscondance of Uday Giri as well as Dharmendra Rai from the court Hajat and the same has not been challenged at the end of appellant. It is also evident that apprehension of appellant is from his Sasural, Kakariya Mathiya which also not been challenged and for that, he is not being prosecuted under the present prosecution rather is confined to on account of recovery of loaded fire arm with cartridges from the possession of the appellant and further, during course of exercising the public duty, he put hurdle, obstructed during course of his apprehension as well as ordered Dharmendra, co-accused to fire upon the prosecution party so that they be deterred to exercise their official duty. It is also evident that all the witnesses have categorically stated with regard to recovery of loaded arm and ammunitions on being searched in presence of seizure list witnesses along with other police officials who have gone to conduct raid for apprehension of absconder
