The appellant in a Letters Patent Appeal sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The court granted permission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was granted and the appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1305 of 2016
====================================================== Vijay Narayan Rajak, S/o Late Satya Narayan Rajak, resident of Village - Sikariya, P.O. Maksudpur, P.S. - Tekari, District - Gaya.
.... .... Appellant
Versus
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Sarvadeo Singh, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U
Vijay Narayan Rajak
Punjab National Bank
Rajendra Menon
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
