The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed Second Appeal No.363 of 1993 as not pressed because the appellant was absent without instruction and the respondent was also not present on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court SA No.363 of 1993 (8) dt.21-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Second Appeal No.363 of 1993
====================================================== Jagat Narayan Prasad .... .... Appellant/s Versus Shri Sharwan Kumar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Narendra Prasad Singh Mr. Jashwir Singh Arora Mr. Gopal Tiwari For the Respondent/s : Mr. T.L.Sao Mr. Prem Nath
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 8 21-10-2016 Mr. J.S.Arora, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, has submitted that he has no instruction from the appellant in this matter in spite of the fact that the matter was adjourned earlier to enable him to seek instruction. Nobody else has appeared on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal. Nobody is present on behalf of the respondent as well. As such, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (V. Nath, J.)
Snkumar/-
U
Jagat Narayan Prasad
Shri Sharwan Kumar
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
