The High Court at Patna condoned a 24-day delay in filing an interlocutory application and dismissed a review petition lacking apparent error.
Delay of 24 days in filing the civil review is condoned; the review petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No. 338 of 2016
Arising out of Letters Patent Appeal No. 1349 of 2015 Along with
Interlocutory Application No. 7970 of 2016
=========================================================== Meena Gupta, Wife of Sri Gagan Kumar Sen, resident of Village and P.O. Laxmipur, P.S. Barari, District-Katihar.
.... .... Appellant/s / Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s / Opposite Party/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 5
: Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, A.C. to G.P. 5
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 03-10-2016
Re.: Interlocutory Application No. 7970 of 2016
The application is for condonation of delay of 24 days in filing of the civil review.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, we find that sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of delay of 24 days in filing the civil review. Consequently, the delay is condoned.
Interlocutory Application stands disposed off
Patna High Court C. REV. No.338 of 2016 dt.03-10-2016
2/2
accordingly.
Re.: Civil Review No. 338 of 2016
Under the garb of review, learned counsel for the
petitioner wishes to re-argue the matter.
We do not find any error apparent on record,
which may warrant review of the order passed by this Court.
Accordingly, the Civil Review Petition is
dismissed.
(Hemant Gupta, J.)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
Anand Kr.
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAVDATE | NA |
| UploadingDate | |
| Transmission Date |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause was shown to condone a delay of 24 days in filing the civil review.
Whether an error apparent on record existed to warrant a review of the impugned order.
Meena Gupta
The State of Bihar
Hemant Gupta
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
