This order restores MA No.96 of 2013 to its original file and allows the restoration application after hearing the petitioner and noting the non-appearance of the opposite parties.
Restoration of MA No.96 of 2013 to its original file allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.442 of 2015 (3) dt.15-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.442 of 2015
In
MA 96 of 2013 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Verma, S/O Late Sonu Lal, R/O Mohalla - Bari Sanght, P.S. Jehanabad, District – Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Dhananjay Kumar, S/O Shri Baleshwar Prasad. 2. Vinay Kumar S/O Shri Baleshwar Prasad. 3. Brijanandan Kumar, S/O Shri Baleshwar Prasad. 4. Ajay Kumar, S/O Shri Baleshwar Prasad. 5. Pintoo Kumar, S/O Shri Baleshwar Prasad. 6. Baleshwar Prasad, S/O Late Ram Kishun Sao. 7. Usha Devi, W/O Shri Baleshwar Prasad. All resident of Village- Hisua Bazar, P.S.- Hisua, District-Nawada. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Srivastava For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 3 15-02-2016 Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, none appearing for the Opposite Parties, MA No.96 of 2013 is directed to be restored to its original file. The restoration application is, accordingly, allowed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
(Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./-Sudip
U
Sanjay Kumar Verma
Dhananjay Kumar and Others
RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
SUDHIR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
