Disposed

Chandrika Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC7 Sept 2016MJC/2117/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition claiming underpayment of family pension. The court held that the impugned order was complied with and dropped the petition, advising petitioner to seek separate legal recourse regarding quantum.

What did the court decide?

The judicial review petition was dropped as the impugned order was complied with; the petitioner was advised to take proper legal recourse regarding the quantum of pension.

Chandrika Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2117 of 2015

¶3

¶4

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14567 of 2014 ====================================================== 1. Chandrika Devi Wife of Late Ram Krishna Prasad Singh R/o Village Gopal Band, P.S. Sarmera, District Nalan. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sri R.D. Ranjan, The Director Health Service, Bihar, Patna 3. Sri Sanjay Kumar, The Accountant General A&G II, Bihar, Patna 4. The State of Jharkhand 5. Dr. Praveen Chandra, The Director, Health Service, State of Jharkhand, Ranchi 6. Sri Manish Sahya, The Accountant General (A&G) Jharkhand, Ranchi 7. Smt. Rani Besra, The First Medical Officer, Sadar Prakhand Godda, District Godda (Jharkhand) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anant Pd. Singh, SC 15 Mr. Hemant Pd. Singh, AC to SC 15 For the State of Jharkhand: Mr. Sanjiv Jaiswal, Advocate For the Accountant General: Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER

¶5

6 07-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna as well as learned counsel representing State of Jharkhand. Petitioner has submitted that PPO has been opened in her name and on account thereof, the direction having been given at an earlier occasion vide order dated 28.06.2016 is found complied with. In a casual manner, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that family pension has been fixed less than the amount for whatever she is entitled to and further failed to

¶6

Patna High Court MJC No.2117 of 2015 (6) dt.07-09-2016

¶7

¶8

disclose in detail.

¶9

Because of the fact that the order impugned has already been complied with, pendency of instant petition will give no fruitful result, whereupon, the same is dropped.

¶10

Petitioner, in case, is found aggrieved with the quantum of the family pension having so fixed, may take proper legal recourse as provide under law.

¶11

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)

¶12

perwez

¶13

Chandrika Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrika Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bans Narayan Upadhayay Vs Nandji Upadhayay and Ors.

Mukesh Thakur and Ors. Vs Nirmaiya Chakraverty and Ors.

Gholam Rasool Khan Vs Bibi Zainab Khatoon @ Totri and Ors.

Nemit Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Brajesh Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Guddu Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.