Dismissed

Ram Pravesh Dubey v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Jun 2016MJC/1523/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed an application accusing respondents of contempt for non-compliance with a previous order directing them to file an application under the Bihar Public Encroachment Act. The court held the petitioner was in contempt and dismissed the application.

What did the court decide?

The application under the Public Encroachment Act was rejected, and the petitioner was found in contempt.

Ram Pravesh Dubey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Contempt of Court | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1523 of 2016

¶3

====================================================== Ram Pravesh Dubey, son of Late Sheo Prasad Dubey, resident of villageShivpur, Post and Police Station-Koragaher, District-Rohtas

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar

¶6

Animesh Kumar Prasar, father’s name not known, the District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram

¶7

Ajay Kumar Shrivastava, father’s name not known, the Circle Officer, Karagahar, District-Rohtas

¶8

Ramjan Mian, son of Lae Morbi Mian 5. Jokhu Ram 6. Gorakh Ram 7. Ishar Ram 8. Vinod Ram, all sons of Late Bhagwat Ram

¶9

Sudarshan Ram

¶10

Sri Bhagwan Ram

¶11

Mohan Ram, all sons of Late Vivagahan Ram

¶12

Dadan Ram, son of Khiri Ram

¶13

Murakut Ram, son of Shiv Gahan Ram

¶14

Suresh Ram, son of Parshuram Ram All are residents of village-Shivpur, post and police stationKaragahar, District-Rohtas .... .... Opposite Parties

¶15

====================================================== Appearance:

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶17

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 22-06-2016 Heard the parties.

¶19

The petitioner complains of non-compliance of the order passed in CWJC No. 1159 of 2014 whereunder this Court taking note of the grievance raised by the petitioner had disposed of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an application under the provisions of the Bihar Public Encroachment Act after impleading the land encroachers and also demonstrating the extent

¶20

Patna High Court MJC No.1523 of 2016 (2) dt.22-06-2016

¶21

¶22

of encroachment made by them. The counsel for the petitioner relies upon a representation filed present at Annexure-2 to maintain the contempt application.

¶23

In my opinion, it is the petitioner who is in contempt for he has failed to abide by the direction. No cause for indulgence is made out.

¶24

The application is dismissed.

¶25

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶26

S.Sb/-

¶27

Ram Pravesh Dubey v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pravesh Dubey v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhat Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suman Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamladitya Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Radha Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

M/s Green Leather Industries Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Tripathi Nursing Home Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.