Allowed

Abhay Kumar v. Shobha Kumari

Patna HC8 Mar 2016MA/207/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a miscellaneous appeal, the Patna High Court condoned a 12-day delay in filing. The court relied on the respondent's concession to set aside an order refusing to set aside an ex parte decree for restitution of conjugal rights and restored the decree. It directed that petitions under Sections 9 and 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act be decided together.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 24-03-2015 and the ex parte judgment and decree dated 27-05-2014 for restitution of conjugal rights were set aside, restoring the petition. Appeal allowed.

Abhay Kumar Vs Shobha Kumari — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Miscellaneous Appeal No.207 of 2015

¶3

=========================================================== Abhay Kumar, son of Yamuna Singh, resident of Village- Barouli, Police Station- Narhat, DistrictNawada. At present Address:- Abhay Kumar Auto Tech. MTTI, Air Force Station, Awadi, Chennai, Pin- 600055, Tamilnadu. .... .... Appellant Versus Shobha Kumari, D/o- Ram Naresh Singh, resident of Village- Puri, Police Station- Giriak, DistrictNalanda. .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

¶4

and

¶5

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 08-03-2016

¶6

I.A. No. 5684 of 2015

¶7

The application is for condoning the delay of 12 days in filing the present appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection if the delay of 12 days in filing the

¶8

appeal is condoned. The delay in filing the appeal is, accordingly, condoned.

¶9

I.A. No. 5684 of 2015 is, thus, allowed.

¶10

Miscellaneous Appeal No.207 of 2015

¶11

The challenge in the present appeal by husband is to an order dated 24^th of March, 2015, whereby an application for setting aside ex parte judgment and decree granted in a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) was dismissed.

¶12

The respondent-wife filed a petition under Section 9 of the Act before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalanda which was allowed on 27^th of May, 2014 when none appeared on behalf of the appellant.

¶13

The appellant filed a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 which now stands transferred to Principal Judge, Family Court, Biharsharif, Nalanda vide order dated 25^th of April, 2013 passed by this Court in Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3001 of 2012. It is admitted that the petition for

¶14

Patna High Court MA No.207 of 2015 dt.08-03-2016

¶15

2 /2

¶16

dissolution of marriage stands dismissed for default and that appellant intends to file an application for restoration of the said case.

¶17

The grievance of the appellant is that he filed an application for setting aside the decree passed under Section 9 of the Act and a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13 of the Act as well. Therefore, ex parte decree for restitution of conjugal rights be set aside as he was not served in the said case. The order passed by the learned trial court refusing to set aside such decree is illegal and on untenable grounds.

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondent-wife has no objection if the application is allowed and the order dated 25^th of March, 2015 is set aside meaning thereby that she has no objection if the ex parte judgment and decree passed against the appellant is set aside.

¶19

In view of the fair concession of the learned counsel for the respondent, the order dated 24^th of March, 2015 passed in Misc. Case No. 09 of 2014 and also the ex parte judgment and decree dated 27^th of May, 2014 passed in Matrimonial Case No. 59 of 2012 is set aside. As a consequence thereof, the petition for restitution of conjugal rights stands restored.

¶20

The petitions under Sections 9 and Section 13 of the Act are required to be decided together. Since Section 13 petition stands dismissed for default, therefore, the present petition is restored to its original number but as and when Section 13 petition is restored, the same shall be transferred and be taken up for decision along with the petition under Section 9 of the Act.

¶21

With the aforesaid directions and observations, the appeal stands

¶22

disposed of.

¶23

(Hemant Gupta, J)

¶24

(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)

¶25

P.K.P. N.A.F.R.

¶26

Abhay Kumar v. Shobha Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhay Kumar v. Shobha Kumari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murari Saran Upadhyaya Vs B.kartikai, The District Magistrate, Nalanda and Ors.

Ram Narayan Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nilkamal Limited Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.