Disposed

Yamuna Prasad v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Oct 2016CWJC/9859/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the recovery of unaccounted pension and advance loss. The court elected to grant the petitioner another opportunity to explain his case before the Joint Secretary, allowing six weeks for representation or a personal hearing if requested, before deciding on liability.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was granted another opportunity to explain his case before Respondent No. 2 within six weeks or obtain a personal hearing.

Yamuna Prasad Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9859 of 2012

¶3

=========================================================== Yamuna Prasad, S/O Late Chandrika Prasad, Resident of Village- Mohanchak Milky, P.S.-Islampur, Distt-Nalanda .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department Bihar, Patna 2. The Joint Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna 3. The Deputy Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Irshad, AC to SC-1

¶4

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-10-2016

¶5

The petitioner was working in the Public Health Engineering Department. In the year 2004, while he was working as Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Daltonganj his services were placed at the disposal of Bihar Rajya Jal Parishad, as Executive Engineer (Mechanics) from where he retired on 31.05.2009. After his retirement, the petitioner has been paid his pension and gratuity. However, after more than two years of his retirement, the Public Health Engineering Department came out with a resolution directing recovery of unaccounted amount of Rs.1,40,294/-.

¶6

The case of the petitioner is that he has submitted the bill to the Pump Operator.

¶7

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

¶8

Patna High Court CWJC No.9859 of 2012 dt.22-10-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

respondents stating that the petitioner being himself an Executive Engineer, knew very well that the Bill is to be submitted before the accountant and not before the Pump Operator. He further submits that the petitioner ought to have explained his case before the Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Division, Munger from where he had drawn the advance.

¶11

If an employee has not accounted for any advance taken by him, he would be liable to make payment of the loss. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner would be granted one more opportunity to explain his case before respondent no.2, Joint Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna. The petitioner must file his representation within six weeks from today along with a copy of this order. In case, the petitioner seeks a personal hearing, the Joint Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna, would grant him a personal hearing to the petitioner.

¶12

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ application stands disposed of.

¶13

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)

¶14

Uday/-

¶15

Yamuna Prasad v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yamuna Prasad v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahdeo Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Ekbal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Meinhardt Singapore Pte Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar Through Amrit Lal Meena and Ors.

Moti Lal Vidyarthi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nand Kishore Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Byas Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.