Sushil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9399 of 2016 (3) dt.28-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9399 of 2016

• ====================================================== 1. Sushil Kumar Son of late Fakir Chand Yadav Resident of VillageHarchandpur, P.s Jalalgarh, District Purnia.

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar , through the Collector, Purnea. 2. The State Election Commission, through its Chairman, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Secretary, State Election Commission Bihar, Patna. 4. The Collector-cum District Returning Officer, Purnea. 5. The sub-divisional Officer-cum-Returning Officer, Purnea. 6. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Purnea. 7. The Block Development Officer-cum-Block Returnign Officer Jalalgarh Block, Within the District of Purnea. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nivedita Nirvikar- GA10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 3 28-06-2016 Perused the office note. Defects are ignored and the matter is taken up for consideration. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Admittedly the petitioner is not the contestant to the post of Pramukh, Panchayat Samiti, Jalalgarh in the district of Purnea. The election to the post of Pramukh has also been held. Even otherwise where the petitioner is not a candidate for the post, he cannot be said to be a person aggrieved by the said election. No cause for indulgence is made out, the writ petition is disposed of. Bibhash/- (Jyoti Saran, J) U