The writ petition stands dismissed due to non-appearance of the petitioner on the day of hearing, having also failed to appear on a previous occasion. No substantive issues were addressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH CO Civil Writ J |
URT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA urisdiction Case No. 9226 of 2011 |
|
|---|---|---|
| =================== Dr.Om Prakash Kumar The State of Bihar & Ors =================== |
================================== .... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Respondent/s =================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s : |
None AC to GA-1 |
|
| =================== CORAM: HONOURABL ORAL ORDER |
=================================== E MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR |
|
| 4. | 06-01-2016 Today ag |
ain, on call, none appeared on behalf of |
| petitioner either to pr | ess the petition or to make a prayer for | |
| adjournment. On last | occasion also, there was non-appearance on | |
| behalf of petitioner. | Learned A.C. to Govt. Advocate–1 is | |
| present. | ||
| The writ prosecution. |
petition stands dismissed due to non- | |
| (Rakesh Kumar, J.) | ||
| Anay U |
Dr. Om Prakash Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
