The writ petition filed by residents of Village Aurain against various state officials and third parties was dismissed due to want of prosecution as no party appeared by counsel despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9101 of 2002
======================================================
Versus
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.9101 of 2002 (6) dt.22-07-2016
2/2
petitioners in support of the present writ petition. None appears on behalf of the respondents either, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the parties are printed in the daily cause list.
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Tahir/-
U
Jhalakjota Devi
Surendra Bahadur Singh
Sanjay Singh
The State of Bihar
The Collector, Rohtas
The Collector, Kaimur
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
