G.M.Parbatiyar and Ors. v. the Bihar Kshetriya Gramin Ban
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition due to non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8859 of 2011
| ====================================================== G.M.Parbatiyar & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Bihar Kshetriya Gramin Bank & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ranjit Kr. Pandey ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
|
| 8. | 04-01-2016 Today again, on call, none appeared on behalf of |
| petitioners either to press the petition or to make a prayer for | |
| adjournment. On earlier date also, there was non-appearance on | |
| behalf of petitioners. Sri Ranjit Kumar Pandey, learned counsel, | |
| who appears on behalf of respondent no. 6 & 7/UCO Bank is | |
| present. | |
| The writ petition stands dismissed due to non- prosecution. |
|
| (Rakesh Kumar, J.) | |
| Anay U |
G.M.Parbatiyar & Ors
The Bihar Kshetriya Gramin Bank & Ors.
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court