Upendra Kumar Sahu and Ors. v. Mostt. Rani Devi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Writ Jurisdiction case dismissed in default due to the absence of the petitioner/counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8832 of 2013 (2) dt.17-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8832 of 2013
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.8832 of 2013 (2) dt.17-05-2016
2 17-05-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent.
Dismissed in default.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U
UPENDRA KUMAR SAHU AND OTHERS
MOSTT. RANI DEVI AND OTHERS
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court