Dismissed

Jagdish Prasad Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC29 Sept 2016CWJC/7727/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking post-retiral dues as infructuous after respondent authorities filed a counter affidavit confirming full payment, granting liberty to approach competent authorities for any calculation errors.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to approach competent authority for redressal of grievance regarding calculation error if any.

Jagdish Prasad Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7727 of 2016

¶3

	====================================================== Jagdish Prasad Tiwari, Son of Late Bishwanath Tiwari, resident of Mohalla - Rajput Nagar Road No. 4 Building No. 150, P.O. + P.S. Industrial Area, Hazipur, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3. The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Muzaffarpur 4. The Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Muzaffarpur 5. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Vaishali at Hazipur 6. The General Provident Fund Officer, Vaishali at Hazipur 7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna 800001 .... .... Respondent/s ======================================================
	Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Siya Ram Shahi, Adv. Mrs. Shally Kumari, Adv. Ms. Namrata Singh, Adv. For the Respondent nos.1to6 : Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GA-7 For the Respondent no.7 : Mr.Uday Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
2	29-09-2016 When the matter has been taken up for consideration on merit, a counter affidavit is being filed on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2, which is taken on the record. The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for a direction to the respondent authorities for payment of his all post-retiral dues enumerated in paragraph 1 of the writ petition. In view of the assertions made in the separate counter affidavits filed on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2 as also the respondent no.7, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that all the post-retiral dues of the petitioner have been paid. However, a liberty is sought to represent the

======================================================
Jagdish Prasad Tiwari, Son of Late Bishwanath Tiwari, resident of Mohalla
- Rajput Nagar Road No. 4 Building No. 150, P.O. + P.S. Industrial Area,
Hazipur, District - Vaishali
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar,
Patna
3. The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Muzaffarpur
4. The Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Muzaffarpur
5. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Vaishali at Hazipur
6. The General Provident Fund Officer, Vaishali at Hazipur
7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna 800001
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================

Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Siya Ram Shahi, Adv.
Mrs. Shally Kumari, Adv.
Ms. Namrata Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent nos.1to6 : Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GA-7
For the Respondent no.7 : Mr.Uday Kumar, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA
ORAL ORDER

29-09-2016
When the matter has been taken up for consideration
on merit, a counter affidavit is being filed on behalf of the
respondent nos.1 and 2, which is taken on the record.
The present writ petition has been filed on behalf of
the petitioner for a direction to the respondent authorities for
payment of his all post-retiral dues enumerated in paragraph 1 of
the writ petition.
In view of the assertions made in the separate counter
affidavits filed on behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2 as also the
respondent no.7, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submits that all the post-retiral dues of the petitioner
have been paid. However, a liberty is sought to represent the

¶4

Patna High Court CWJC No.7727 of 2016 (2) dt.29-09-2016

¶5

¶6

authority concerned, if there is any error in the calculation of postretiral dues of the petitioner.

¶7

In view of the aforesaid submissions that all the postretiral dues of the petitioner have been paid, the present writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

¶8

However, if there is any error in the calculation of the post-retiral dues of the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to approach the competent authority for redressal of his valid grievances.

¶9

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶10

Arvind/-

¶11

Jagdish Prasad Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Prasad Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umrawati Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Yakub Miyan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Abdul Mannan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Budhu Yadav @ Bharthu Yada Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dayal Chandra Roy Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mamun Bakht Khan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.