Dismissed

Vishal Tiwari @ Pramod Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Feb 2016CWJC/7538/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a writ to shift a government medical officer to a different location to ensure a fair departmental inquiry, though the petitioner claimed no direct grievance. The court disposed of the application permitting the grievance to be agitated before the appropriate authority via counter-affidavit facilities.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to agitate the grievance before the appropriate authority/Forum.

Vishal Tiwari @ Pramod Kumar Tiwari Vs The State Of… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7538 of 2013

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Vishal Tiwari @ Pramod Kumar Tiwari Son Of Jagdish Tiwari Resident Of Village - Gopalpur, P.S. - Koilwar, District - Bhojpur At Ara, Presently Secretary Of N.G.O. Namely Sarv Vaumik Seva Sansthan, Having Its Registered Office At Jagdeo Nagar, Anait, Ara

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Secretary, Department Of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna

¶9

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur At Ara

¶10

The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, Bhojpur At Ara

¶11

Dr. (Smt.) Neelam Kumari Wife Of Name Not Known To The Petitioner Female Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Koilwar, Bhojpur At Ara

¶12

.... .... Respondent/s

¶13

===========================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra

¶16

For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.K. Mandal, S.C.-24

¶17

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT

¶18

Date: 04-02-2016

¶19

Heard both sides.

¶20

Although, the petitioner is not directly aggrieved by allowing respondent no. 5 to stay at the place where the departmental proceeding was initiated against her yet the present application has been filed for a direction to shift respondent no. 5 from Primary Health Centre, Koilwar, Bhojpur at Ara to other place in order to have fair enquiry/departmental proceeding.

¶21

Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4 have been filed.

¶22

Mr. Mishra, looking to the stand taken in the counter

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.7538 of 2013 dt.04-02-2016

¶24

2/2

¶25

affidavit of respondent no. 2, states that the application be disposed of permitting the petitioner to agitate the grievance before the appropriate authority/Forum in accordance with law.

¶26

The application stands disposed with the said liberty.

¶27

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶28

Pankaj/U

Vishal Tiwari @ Pramod Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Tiwari @ Pramod Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurishankar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramjee Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Gayatri Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satya Prakash @ Tinku Vs Rinku Kumari

Paras Nath Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Amarnath Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.