3. It is not in dispute that the original writ petitioner Bibi Nasima Khatoon as also respondent no.6 Ramautar Pandit purchased the lands in question from one Md.Rafiqu Uddin. The respondent no.6 purchased the lands in question through a registered sale deed in the year 1970, whereas original writ petitioner also purchased the lands in question through a registered sale deed in the year 1973. During the consolidation proceeding, register of lands in terms of Section 9 of the Act was prepared in the name of private respondent no.6 and the same was accordingly published in terms of Section 10(1) of the Act; whereafter the original writ petitioner filed an objection under Section 10(2) of the Act, which gave rise to Case No. 411 of 1976. The aforesaid objection case filed by the original writ petitioner was allowed by order dated 30.04.1977 by the Assistant Consolidation Officer, Simri Bakhtiarpur, as contained in Annexure-3, in terms of Section 10(3) of the Act and the lands in question were directed to be recorded in the name of the original writ petitioner. The respondent no.6, being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, filed Consolidation Appeal No. 24 of 1993, which was finally allowed by order dated 14.11.1998 (Annexure-4) passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Saharsa and the order passed by the Assistant Consolidation Officer was set aside and the land in question was directed to be recorded in the name of the respondent no.6. The original writ petitioner, being aggrieved by the aforesaid appellate order, preferred Consolidation Revision No. 35 of 1998 under
