====================================================== Rasendra Kumar Singh, S/O Late Rajendra Singh, Resident Of MohallaKatar, P.O- Shankarpuri, P.S- Indrapuri, ( Dehri On- Sone), DistrictRohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Divisional Commissioner, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate-Cum- Collector, Rohtas At Sasaram 4. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Sasaram. 5. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dehri, District- Rohtas At Sasaram. 6. The Circle Officer, Dehri, District- Rohtas At Sasaram. 7. Birendra Kumar, S/O Sri Ramayan Ram, Resident Of Mohalla Katar, P.O- Shankarpuri, P.S- Indrapuri ( Dehri-On- Sone), District- Rohtas. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Prasad, Adv. For the Respondent nos.1to6 : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GP-22 Mr.Sushil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 22-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned GP-22 appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 6. However, none appears on behalf of the respondent no.7, despite valid service of notice. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 30.01.2014 passed in Land Dispute Appeal No.230 of 2013 by the respondent Divisional Commissioner, Patna, as contained in Annexure-12 to the writ petition, whereby the aforesaid appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner has been dismissed for the reasons recorded in that order and the order dated 21.12.2012 passed in Land Dispute Case No.94 of 2012-13 by the respondent D.C.L.R., Dehri (Rohtas), as contained in Annexure-11, in exercising of his powers under Section 4 of The Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 (in short ‘Act, 2009’) has been affirmed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, while assailing the aforesaid two orders passed by the