Dr.Smt. Punam Choubey v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
One Judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to efflux of time and withdrawal of the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4524 of 2011
====================================================== Dr. (Smt.) Punam Choubey W/O Amulo Kumar Choubey, Lecturer, Deptt. of Kaya Chikitsa, Govt. Ayurvedic College, Patna R/O Flat No.R/F-130, Lohia Nagar Kankarbagh, P.S.-Kankarbagh, Distt.-Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Medical Education, Family Welfare & Indigenous System of Medicine & Homoeopathy, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Joint Secretary, Deptt. of Medical Education, Family Welfare, Indigenous System of Medicine & Homoeopathy, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4. The Principal, Govt. Ayurved College, Kadamkuan, Town & Distt.Patna. 5. Dr. Dineshwar Prasad S/O Shri Jag Narayan Prasad R/O Vill., Post & P.S.Nokha, Distt.-Rohtas at present posted as Lecturer Deptt. of Kaya Chikitsa, Govt. Ayurvrdic College, Patna.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar For the Respondent/s : AC to Addl. Advocate General 5 Ms. Mrinalini ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
5. 11-01-2016 At the very outset, learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General – 5, by way of referring to averment made in counter affidavit, in presence of learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Mrinalini, learned counsel for the private respondent i.e. respondent no. 5, submits that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute, however; he submits that order impugned, which has been challenged in the present writ petition, has already been withdrawn and as such, nothing is required to be adjudicated in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.4524 of 2011 (5) dt.11-01-2016
2/2
present case.
In view of the fact that writ petition has become
infructuous, the writ petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay
U
Dr. (Smt.) Punam Choubey
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Medical Education, Family Welfare & Indigenous System of Medicine & Homoeopathy
The Joint Secretary, Deptt. of Medical Education, Family Welfare, Indigenous System of Medicine & Homoeopathy
The Principal, Govt. Ayurved College, Kadamkuan
Dr. Dineshwar Prasad
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court