Civil Writ Jurisdiction case where the petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls despite the respondent being represented. The application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4511 of 2014
====================================================== 1. Kedar Nath Dubey Son Of Late Vindhyachal Dubey Resident Of Village - Saraiya Pahar, P.O. Brahima, P.S. Sidhwalia, District - Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Nagar Parishad , Chapra Through Its Executive Officer 2. Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Chapra 3. Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Chapra 4. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Finance Department, Patna 5. Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jay Prakash Sharma, A.C. to G.P.-XXI For the Municipality : Mr. Indu Bhushan, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 19-11-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the
petitioner. Learned counsel for the Chapra Municipality is present. The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Pradeep/-
U
Kedar Nath Dubey
Nagar Parishad, Chapra
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
