Dismissed

M/s Daya Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC11 Aug 2016CWJC/4507/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to withdraw writ application with liberty to approach High Court against an order under Bihar VAT Act, 2005. Court dismissed application as withdrawn without expressing opinion on merits, reserving final decision for later.

What did the court decide?

Writ application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file writ challenging order dated 17.11.2014 under Bihar VAT Act, 2005.

M/s Daya Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs The… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4507 of 2016

¶3

======================================================

¶4

M/s Daya Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. through its Dy. General Manager, Mr. Praveen Kumar Mishra, son of Badrinath Mishra, aged 40 years, resident of Manpur, Gaya, Bihar; Post Office - Manpur, Police Station – Manpur; District - Gaya.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Appeal, Gaya Circle, Kachari Road, Gaya. 3. The Dy. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Gaya Circle, Kachari Road, Gaya. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Gaya Circle, Kachari Road, Gaya.

¶7

.... .... Respondent/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate.

¶10

Mr. Prakash Sahay, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. A.K. Rastogi, A.A.G. 15 Mr. Rakesh Narayan Singh, A.C. to A.A.G. 15

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and

¶12

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)

¶13

14 11-08-2016 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ application with liberty to challenge the order dated 17^th of November, 2014 passed by the Joint Commissioner (Appeal), Commercial Taxes, Magadh Division, Gaya as per the remedy provided under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

¶14

In view of the request made, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. However, the grant

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.4507 of 2016 (14) dt.11-08-2016

¶16

2/2

¶17

of liberty shall not be construed as any expression of the opinion on the merits of the controversy. As and when the petitioner avails the alternative remedy, the same shall be considered and decided

¶18

in accordance with law.

¶19

(Hemant Gupta, J)

¶20

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶21

P.K.P. U

M/s Daya Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Daya Engineering Works Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bibi Kausar Jahan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhagwan Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Husne Ara Begam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Moni Bricks Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Awas Bricks Udyog Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bindu Agro Industries Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.